Incident Debrief®

Did you know?

Up to 70% of public safety personnel who are exposed to a critical incident NEVER attend a stress debrief session, or otherwise receive any type of follow-up support.

The reasons include:

  • Lack of affordable debrief resources available to the agency
  • The individual’s desire to just “move on” from the incident
  • The individual’s reluctance to appear vulnerable in the presence of others within a group debrief setting
  • An individual’s inability to attend a group session due to scheduling conflicts
  • Group debrief sessions not being available in the aftermath of incidents experienced by only a small number of public safety workers

Consequences of Doing Nothing

If left unaddressed, the stress generated by a single critical or non-critical stressful incident (or multiple incidents) can fester over time and lead to:

  • PTSD
  • Secondary traumatic stress
  • Anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, suicide ideation
  • and more

And this, in turn, can lead to:

  • Poor job performance
  • Absenteeism and presenteeism
  • Health and disability claims
  • Staff turnover, and
  • Agency-wide impacts

The Incident Debrief® Platform

By making the Incident Debrief® platform available to your personnel they can now self-administer their own ANONYMOUS critical incident stress debriefs 24/7 from the privacy of home using any internet connected device.

Not only can they immediately address and process a critical incident right after it occurs, they can also use Incident Debrief® to address previous critical incidents that were never properly debriefed going back weeks, months or even years.

NOTE: Incident Debrief® is not intended as a replacement for traditional face-to-face group-based CISD, but rather as an alternative for the 70% of personnel who will never attend a group CISD session for the reasons outlined above.

Incident Debrief® can also be used in addition to attending a traditional group debrief session in order to enhance overall debrief effectiveness.

Incident Debrief®'s features include:

  • Multi-part self-administered Structured Incident Debrief (10-15 minutes to complete)
  • Optional self-assessment for PTSD, secondary traumatic stress, moral distress, depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances
  • Optional resilience testing and strengthening
  • Optional completion certificates for mandated debriefs
  • Optional navigation to additional debrief help-resources
  • Immediate platform deployment
  • Zero agency administration required
  • Utilization stats available 24/7
  • Grant friendly
  • Super-affordable (see pricing below)

Total Anonymity / Zero Stigma

When we say that all debriefs conducted on the Incident Debrief® platform are completely ANONYMOUS, we mean it! When registering their account on the platform, your personnel are not required to provide their name, email address, cell phone number, or any personal identifying information, nor do we log their IP addresses on our servers.

This provides users a stigma-free safe space to self-administer their personalized debrief from the privacy of their own homes. They can do this 24/7 using any internet-connected device.

Incident Debrief®'s anonymity and stigma-free environment makes it particularly appealing to the 70% of public safety workers who may otherwise be reluctant to seek help for their critical incident-related mental health and wellbeing concerns for fear of being found out or stigmatized.

Personalized Incident Debrief® Report

Users who complete the Incident Debrief® debrief/intervention receive their own personalized Incident Debrief® Report highlighting any adverse or “at risk” screening results. Our algorithms then offer recommendations for how best to address each adverse or “at risk” finding

Navigation to Your Curated Help-Resources

The Incident Debrief® debrief/intervention is easily programmable. This means we can embed your existing list of curated wellbeing resources into the intervention. Thus when an adverse finding is identified, our system can algorithmically recommend your curated resources to the user when appropriate. An example would be algorithmically recommending a counseling resource that you have contracted with to provide counseling services to your personnel.

We can also embed existing peer supporters into the platform and recommend them when appropriate. If you do not currently have a peer support network or program, we can help you develop one. (For details, speak with an Incident Debrief® representative)

Download / Share / Optimize

Users can opt to download their personalized Incident Debrief® report into a PDF file and then share it with a counselor, peer supporter, or chaplain, if applicable. Sharing the report and going through it with a trusted support professional or colleague will optimize the user’s chances for a more complete recovery from the hazardous effects of both critical and non-critical incidents.

Incident Archive

Users will have the option to share their debrief data into a global archive that will allow other users of the platform to see how their fellow first responders have addressed both critical and non-critical incidents. The purpose of the archive is to normalize the emotions they may be experiencing and help speed their recovery. Any information shared to the archive will be completely de-identified.

There is also an option to allow first responders who experienced the same incident to share their data into the archive for the benefit of only those who were also involved in the same incident response and recovery effort (For details, speak with an Incident Debrief® representative).

Web Application vs Mobile App

Incident Debrief® is offered as a web application that is fully optimized and responsive for both desktop and mobile devices. We have intentionally chosen NOT to offer Incident Debrief® as a mobile app for the following reasons:

  • The need to download a mobile app, register an account, and authenticate one’s identity takes time and creates friction that results in barriers to initial engagement. By comparison, Incident Debrief® may be accessed immediately using a phone’s browser.
  • Mobile apps are generally designed for ongoing, long-term use, whereas Incident Debrief® is typically utilized on a periodic basis (quarterly or semi-annually), enabling users to conduct self-assessment to gain insight into their mental wellbeing, after which their use of the platform tends to subside until such time as they wish to re-screen.
  • A mobile app by its very nature requires users to provide their cell phone numbers, and often other identifying information. Not only might this make users reluctant to download and use an app, but it also has the potential for ransomware exploits.

For these reasons, we believe a phone app for this case-use is contraindicated.

Circumventing Ransomware Exploits

As mentioned above, when registering their accounts on Incident Debrief®, users are not required to provide their names, email addresses, cell phone numbers, or any other personal information that would reveal their identities. Moreover, our servers do not store the user’s IP address.

As a result, even if the Incident Debrief® servers were hacked, there is nothing that identifies the user or their screening data. This precludes ransomware exploits, as there is no opportunity or incentive for a malign actor to threaten to publicly disclose user information, since they would not be able to associate screening data with any specific user.

Features and Functionality

Here are the platform features and functionality (click on the (i) icons next to each feature below for a description of each)

Unique sub-domain i

Each agency or company that is licensed to use the platform will be assigned a sub-domain that uses a unique URL prefix to distinguish it from all other such sub-domains. For example, if the licensee were the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), then the unique sub-domain URL would be: UCLA.INCIDENTDEBRIEF.DIY, etc

Unlimited users/debrief interventions
QR flyer i

Each agency or company that is licensed to use the platform will be provided with a one-page flyer that has a description of the platform. These flyers are intended to be posted up in the workplace. In addition to containing general information about the platform, these flyers will also contain a QR code that can be scanned with phones, allowing users them to navigate directly to the unique sub-domain URL assigned to the agency or company.

Incident Debrief® Personalized Report i

Upon completion of the intervention, our system will generate a personalized Incident Debrief® Report that groups findings into clinical, sub-clinical, and non-clinical categories. Based on each unique user’s findings, our system will then make recommendations for help based on the findings and severity levels and will navigate the user to the appropriate help-resources based upon those findings. The report will also contain a record of all of the user’s responses to the various screenings conducted, as well as individual screening results and severity scores for each.

Navigation to help-resources i

Based on each unique user’s findings, our system will make recommendations for help based on the findings and severity levels and will navigate the user to the appropriate help-resources based upon those findings.

Administrative page i

Each agency or company that is licensed to use the platform will be assigned a unique administrative page where they can view utilization statistics and population wide analytics.

Resource Roster i

Each agency or company that is licensed to use the platform may upload a list of their existing help-resources via their admin page. These resources may include EAP, peer support, chaplain programs, financial wellness programs, etc. These resources will write to a Resources Roster on the agency’s unique sub-domain that will be accessible to all users of the platform. This will help to drive utilization of these resources when accessed by users in the context of their having completed screenings that indicate they could benefit from further intervention.

Navigation to Resource Roster i

The platform’s algorithms automatically navigate users to the Resources Roster when their screening results indicate that they could benefit from reaching out to one or more of the resources contained in the roster.

Screening analytics/Utilization stats i

The Incident Debrief® platform tracks and displays a robust set of de-identified analytics in real-time which are available for management review 24/7 . The analytics provide an overall view of the relative wellbeing and mental health of your workforce.

These analytics include:

  • Number of unique account registrations
  • Aggregate number of screenings
  • Number of screenings attributable to each mental health condition and wellbeing challenge

Analytics are filterable by date range and are exportable to PDF.

Each agency or company that is licensed to use the platform will have access to their own administrative page where they will be able to view utilization statistics. These statistics will be filterable by date range.

Completion certificate i

The Incident Debrief® platform allows users to generate a certificate that evidences their completion of the screenings.

The Bottom Line

The Incident Debrief® will optimize your agency’s opportunities to achieve the following in the aftermath of a critical incident:

  • Improved employee performance
  • Improved organizational functioning
  • Reductions in productivity losses (absenteeism/presenteeism)
  • Reductions in occupational burnout
  • Improved community relations
  • Potential reductions in excessive use of force and lawsuits
  • Reductions in workplace conflict
  • Reductions in staff turnover
  • Reductions in health, disability, and workmen's comp claims

Platform Costs

The annual cost for the Incident Debrief® platform is based on the total number of employees employed by your agency as set forth in the table below.

Number of Personnel* Annual Platform Fee
< 25 $3,650
≥ 25 $5,600
≥ 50 $7,500
≥ 75 $9,500
≥ 100 $11,500
≥ 150 $14,750
≥ 200 $18,000
≥ 300 $21,250
≥ 400 $25,750
≥ 500 $30,250
≥ 750 ***Call for quote***

*Definition of personnel

The number of personnel includes both full-time and part-time sworn and non-sworn employees and volunteer staff.

 

About Radiant Interactive Group, Inc.

Incident Debrief® is owned and operated by Radiant Interactive Group, Inc.

Radiant is a full stack web development firm established in 1999. We specialize in building interactive web platforms in the behavioral health and wellbeing sectors. We leverage internet technology to help people achieve improved life-management skills in the areas of mental/behavioral health, behavioral change, self-assessment, resilience, wellness, work-life balance, and day-to-day living. Radiant is a for-profit California corporation located in Laguna Beach, Ca. Radiant aligns to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0.

Platform Architecture

Incident Debrief® is built on Radiant Interactive Group’s proprietary platform architecture which has been continuously iterated and honed over the past 25+ years. Our platform architecture has been used to build interactive web applications for Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs), addiction treatment centers, medical research programs, public safety agencies, and community health centers (FQHCs).

For more information, or to arrange a live demo of the Incident Debrief® platform via video conferencing, call:

 

Completion time: 5-10 minutes


The Life Satisfaction Survey measures life-satisfaction and wellbeing across 12 life-dimensions, as follows:

  • Purpose
  • Hope
  • Confidence; Self-efficacy
  • Gratitude; Appreciation
  • Marriage/relationship satisfaction
  • Family relationship
  • Social relationships
  • Community
  • Personal finances
  • Physical health
  • Mental/emotional health
  • Spiritual/religious

 

Our database renders a satisfaction score within each of the 12 life-dimensions listed above, as well as an overall wellbeing score, allowing you to get a snapshot of your current life-satisfaction and wellbeing levels. The Life Satisfaction survey can be repeated as frequently as desired, thereby allowing you to view a history of your results along with progress (or regression) over time.

Completion time: 5-10 minutes


The Work-Life Stressors Inventory consists of questions related to the 12 most common non-clinical issues that negatively impact wellbeing. These include the following:

  • Bullying, harassment, or discrimination in the workplace
  • Unsafe/dangerous work environment
  • Eldercare issues/concerns
  • Childcare/rearing/special needs
  • Single parenting
  • Marital/relationship issues/concerns
  • Family dysfunction
  • Financial stress/hardship
  • Legal issues/concerns
  • Health challenges
  • Social isolation/loneliness
  • COVID-related distress

 

The survey allows you to rate your level of distress for any of the stressors you are experiencing.

Completion time: 5-10 minutes


The Academic, Work, Life Stressors Inventory consists of questions related to the 12 most common non-clinical issues that negatively impact wellbeing. These include the following:

  • Bullying, harassment, or discrimination
  • Unsafe/dangerous campus or work environment
  • Eldercare issues/concerns
  • Childcare/rearing/special needs
  • Single parenting
  • Marital/relationship issues/concerns
  • Family dysfunction
  • Financial stress/hardship
  • Legal issues/concerns
  • Health challenges
  • Social isolation/loneliness
  • COVID-related distress

 

The survey allows you to rate your level of distress for any of the stressors you are experiencing.

Completion time: 3-5 minutes


The SQ-Org consists of 20 questions that measure stress levels attributable to organizational demands placed on individual first responders and public safety personnel.

The results provide personnel and command staff granular insights into organizational-induced stress and may offer opportunities to make organizational changes and enhancements to help mitigate relevant stressors.

Completion time: 3-5 minutes


The SQ-Op consists of 20 questions that allows first responders and public safety personnel to measure individual operational stress levels related to public safety work.

The results provide personnel and command staff granular insights into stressors associated with operational policing and may offer opportunities for operational changes to help mitigate these stressors.

Completion time: 10-20 minutes


The APR Financial Stress Scale consists of 3 scales containing a total of 24 statements regarding your view of, and attitude toward, your personal finances and your financial condition. The survey measures how your finances are affecting you personally, how they affect your interactions with others, and the degree to which you may be experiencing physiological effects related to your finances.

Completion time: 7-12 minutes


The Resilience Checkup consists of an 18-item screener that measures resiliency across 6 scales of resilience, as follows:

  • Perseverance
  • Self-efficacy
  • Optimism
  • Adaptability
  • Alignment
  • Self-care

 

Our database renders a score for each of the 6 scales listed above, as well as an overall resilience score, allowing you to get a snapshot of your current resilience levels. The Resilience Survey can be repeated as frequently as desired, thereby allowing you to view a history of your results along with progress (or regression) over time.

Completion time: 7-12 minutes


The Burnout Screener consists of 22 questions across 3 scales which assess the level of burnout, if any, you may be experiencing in your job.

The 3 scales measure the following:

  • Exhaustion: Characterized by feelings of energy depletion, and being overwhelmed or over-extended
  • Depersonalization: Characterized by mental distance or disengagement from one’s job, co-workers, or customers/clients, and/or feelings of negativity or general cynicism related to one’s job and employing organization
  • Reduced Efficacy: Characterized by feelings of ineffectiveness on the job and questioning of one's job or career

 

“Burnout” is present when you score in the MODERATE to HIGH range on the Exhaustion and Depersonalization Scales, and in the LOW range for Personal Achievement/Efficacy. Scoring “at risk” within one or two of the 3 scales means you are experiencing some degree of work-related distress, and may also indicate you are headed toward burnout in the future.

Completion time: 3-5 minutes


The Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS) consists of 7 questions that measure your satisfaction with your relationship. The scores range from 7 to 35, with the following results:

  • 7-14 - Low satisfaction
  • 15-21 - Average satisfaction
  • 22-35 - High satisfaction

Completion time: 7-12 minutes


The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is the most used tool to self-assess whether you might be at risk for occupational burnout.

The MBI consists of 22 questions that measure three components:

  • Exhaustion: Characterized by feelings of energy depletion, and being overwhelmed or over-extended
  • Depersonalization: Characterized by mental distance or disengagement from one's job, co-workers, or customers, or feelings of negativism related to one's job
  • Reduced Efficacy: Characterized by feelings of ineffectiveness and questioning of one's job or career

 

“Burnout” is present when you score in the MODERATE to HIGH range on the Exhaustion and Depersonalization Scales, and in the LOW range for Personal Achievement/Efficacy. Scoring “at risk” within one or two of the 3 scales means you are experiencing some degree of work-related distress, and may also indicate you are headed toward burnout in the future.

Completion time: 7-12 minutes


The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is the most used tool to self-assess whether you might be at risk for occupational burnout.

The MBI consists of 22 questions that measure three components:

  • Exhaustion: Characterized by feelings of energy depletion, and being overwhelmed or over-extended
  • Depersonalization: Characterized by mental distance or disengagement from one's job, co-workers, or customers, or feelings of negativism related to one's job
  • Reduced Efficacy: Characterized by feelings of ineffectiveness and questioning of one's job or career

 

“Burnout” is present when you score in the MODERATE to HIGH range on the Exhaustion and Depersonalization Scales, and in the LOW range for Personal Achievement/Efficacy. Scoring “at risk” within one or two of the 3 scales means you are experiencing some degree of work-related distress, and may also indicate you are headed toward burnout in the future.

Completion time: 7-12 minutes


The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-GSS) is the most used tool to self-assess whether you might be at risk for academic burnout.

The MBI consists of 16 questions that measure three components:

  • Exhaustion: Characterized by feelings of energy depletion, and being overwhelmed or over-extended
  • Cynicism: Characterized by mental distance or disengagement from one's studies, fellow students and faculty, or feelings of negativism related to one's studies
  • Reduced Efficacy: Characterized by feelings of ineffectiveness and questioning of one's academic pursuits

Completion time: 5 minutes


The Moral Distress Inventory consists of 13 questions that measure three scales:

  • Bearing Witness: Characterized by witnessing events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.
  • Failing to Prevent: Characterized by failing to prevent events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.
  • Perpetrating: Characterized by perpetrating events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.

 

“Moral Injury” is present when you score in the MODERATE to HIGH range on one or more of the three MI scales (Bearing witness; Failing to prevent; Perpetrating). The more scales scored at higher severity, the greater the presence of Moral Injury. The end state of prolonged Moral Injury is Occupational Burnout.

Click on the Learn More button to gain a better understanding of Moral Injury of Healthcare.

Learn More

Moral Injury

From Wikipedia:

Moral injury refers to an injury to an individual's moral conscience and values resulting from an act of perceived moral transgression, which produces profound emotional guilt and shame, and in some cases also a sense of betrayal, anger and profound "moral disorientation".

From the Veterans Administration:

Moral injury occurs when people perpetrate, fail to prevent, or witness events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.

Moral Injury in Healthcare

From FixMoralInjury.org:

Moral injury occurs when clinicians are repeatedly expected, while providing care, to make choices that transgress their long standing, deeply held commitment to healing. It reframes the challenge of distress from "burnout", which suggests a lack of resilience on the part of clinicians, to one that more accurately locates the source of distress in a conflict-ridden healthcare system.

From Stat News:

In an increasingly business-oriented and profit-driven health care environment, clinicians must consider a multitude of factors other than their patients' best interests when deciding on treatment. Financial considerations — of hospitals, health care systems, insurers, patients, and sometimes of the physician himself or herself — lead to conflicts of interest. Electronic health records, which distract from patient encounters and fragment care, but which are extraordinarily effective at tracking productivity and other business metrics, overwhelm busy clinicians with tasks unrelated to providing outstanding face-to-face interactions. The constant specter of litigation drives physicians to over-test, over-read, and over-react to results — at times actively harming patients to avoid lawsuits.

Patient satisfaction scores and provider rating and review sites can give patients more information about choosing a physician, a hospital, or a health care system. But they can also silence physicians from providing necessary but unwelcome advice to patients and can lead to over-treatment to keep some patients satisfied. Business practices may drive providers to refer patients within their own systems, even knowing that doing so will delay care or that their equipment or staffing is sub-optimal.

Navigating an ethical path among such intensely competing drivers is emotionally and morally exhausting. Continually being caught between the Hippocratic oath, a decade of training, and the realities of making a profit from people at their sickest and most vulnerable is an untenable and unreasonable demand. Routinely experiencing the suffering, anguish, and loss of being unable to deliver the care that patients need is deeply painful. These routine, incessant betrayals of patient care and trust are examples of "death by a thousand cuts." Any one of them, delivered alone, might heal. But repeated daily, they coalesce into the moral injury of health care.

For more information on the efforts to mitigate Moral Injury in Healthcare, visit: FixMoralInjury.org

Completion time: 5 minutes


The Moral Distress Inventory-First Responders consists of 10 questions that measure 4 scales of Moral Injury in first responder populations. The 4 scales include:

  • Bearing Witness: Characterized by witnessing events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.
  • Failing to Prevent: Characterized by failing to prevent events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.
  • Perpetrating: Characterized by perpetrating events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.
  • Global Sense of Moral Wellbeing

 

“Moral Injury” is present when you score in the MODERATE to HIGH range on one or more of the three MI scales (Bearing witness; Failing to prevent; Perpetrating), and when your sense of moral wellbeing is diminished or compromised. The more scales scored at higher severity, the greater the presence of Moral Injury. The end state of prolonged Moral Injury is Occupational Burnout.

Click on the Learn More button to gain a better understanding of Moral Injury of Healthcare.

Learn More

Moral Injury in First Responder Populations

From Wikipedia:

Moral injury refers to an injury to an individual's moral conscience and values resulting from an act of perceived moral transgression, which produces profound emotional guilt and shame, and in some cases also a sense of betrayal, anger and profound "moral disorientation".

From the Veterans Administration:

Moral injury occurs when people perpetrate, fail to prevent, or witness events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.

Completion time: 5 minutes


The Moral Distress Inventory consists of 10 questions that measure 4 scales of Moral Injury. The 4 scales include:

  • Bearing Witness: Characterized by witnessing events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.
  • Failing to Prevent: Characterized by failing to prevent events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.
  • Perpetrating: Characterized by perpetrating events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.
  • Global Sense of Moral Wellbeing

 

“Moral Injury” is present when you score in the MODERATE to HIGH range on one or more of the three MI scales (Bearing witness; Failing to prevent; Perpetrating), and when your sense of moral wellbeing is diminished or compromised. The more scales scored at higher severity, the greater the presence of Moral Injury. The end state of prolonged Moral Injury is Occupational Burnout.

Click on the Learn More button to gain a better understanding of Moral Injury.

Learn More

Moral Injury

From Wikipedia:

Moral injury refers to an injury to an individual's moral conscience and values resulting from an act of perceived moral transgression, which produces profound emotional guilt and shame, and in some cases also a sense of betrayal, anger and profound "moral disorientation".

From the Veterans Administration:

Moral injury occurs when people perpetrate, fail to prevent, or witness events that contradict deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.

From Dr. Jonathan Shay:

Doctor and clinical psychiatrist Jonathan Shay describes moral injury as perpetrating, failing to prevent, bearing witness to, or learning about acts that transgress deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.

Dr Shay distills Moral Injury down as follows:

  1. A betrayal of what's right
  2. by someone who holds legitimate authority (or by one's self)
  3. in a high stakes situation

In the 1980s University of Nebraska Medical Center ethicist Andrew Jameton observed that this kind of moral distress was not confined to the military realm. It often “arises when one knows the right thing to do,” he wrote, “but constraints make it nearly impossible to pursue the right course of action.”

Completion time: 5-10 minutes


Adverse childhood experiences, or ACEs, are potentially traumatic events that occur in childhood (0-17 years). For example:

  • experiencing violence, abuse, or neglect
  • witnessing violence in the home or community
  • having a family member attempt or die by suicide

 

Also included are aspects of the child’s environment that can undermine their sense of safety, stability, and bonding, such as growing up in a household with:

  • substance use problems
  • mental health problems
  • instability due to parental separation or household members being in jail or prison

 

Please note the examples above are not a complete list of adverse experiences. Many other traumatic experiences could impact health and wellbeing.

ACEs are linked to chronic health problems, mental illness, and substance use problems in adolescence and adulthood. ACEs can also negatively impact education, job opportunities, and earning potential. However, ACEs can be prevented.

ACEs are common. About 61% of adults surveyed across 25 states reported they had experienced at least one type of ACE before age 18, and nearly 1 in 6 reported they had experienced four or more types of ACEs.

Preventing ACEs could potentially reduce many health conditions. For example, by preventing ACEs, up to 1.9 million heart disease cases and 21 million depression cases could have been potentially avoided.

Some children are at greater risk than others. Women and several racial/ethnic minority groups were at greater risk for experiencing four or more types of ACEs.

ACEs are costly. The economic and social costs to families, communities, and society totals hundreds of billions of dollars each year. A 10% reduction in ACEs in North America could equate to an annual savings of $56 billion.

ACEs can have lasting, negative effects on health, well-being, as well as life opportunities such as education and job potential. These experiences can increase the risks of injury, sexually transmitted infections, maternal and child health problems (including teen pregnancy, pregnancy complications, and fetal death), involvement in sex trafficking, and a wide range of chronic diseases and leading causes of death such as cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and suicide.

ACEs and associated social determinants of health, such as living in under-resourced or racially segregated neighborhoods, frequently moving, and experiencing food insecurity, can cause toxic stress (extended or prolonged stress). Toxic stress from ACEs can negatively affect children’s brain development, immune systems, and stress-response systems. These changes can affect children’s attention, decision-making, and learning.

Children growing up with toxic stress may have difficulty forming healthy and stable relationships. They may also have unstable work histories as adults and struggle with finances, jobs, and depression throughout life. These effects can also be passed on to their own children. Some children may face further exposure to toxic stress from historical and ongoing traumas due to systemic racism or the impacts of poverty resulting from limited educational and economic opportunities.

The ACEs Questionnaire consists of 10 questions.

SOURCE: CDC.gov

Completion time: 8-15 minutes


Social determinants of health (SDoH) are the non-medical factors that influence health outcomes. They are the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age, and the wider set of forces and systems shaping the conditions of daily life. As defined by the World Health Organization, these forces (e.g., racism, climate) and systems include economic policies and systems, development agendas, social norms, social policies, and political systems.

SDoH are linked to a lack of opportunity and resources to protect, improve, and maintain health. Taken together, these factors create health inequities— types of health disparities that stem from unfair and unjust systems, policies, and practices, and limit access to the opportunities and resources needed to live the healthiest life possible.

SOURCE: CDC.gov

Our proprietary SDoH survey consists of 16 items that comprise the most common SDoH factors.

These factors include unemployment, income insecurity, food insecurity, housing insecurity, exposure to toxic air, contaminated drinking water, or environmental toxins, unhealthy living or working conditions, discrimination, workplace harassment, intimate partner violence, childhood trauma, and more.

Completion time: 5-30 minutes


The Behavioral Health Risk Assessment (BHRA) allows you to measure your behavioral and mental wellbeing across the 14 behavioral and mental health conditions listed below.

  • Alcohol
  • Tobacco
  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Substance Use Disorder
  • Sleep Disorder
  • Gambling
  • Anger Disorder
  • Sexual Behavior
  • Eating Disorder
  • Intimate Partner Violence
  • Panic
  • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Bi-Polar Disorder

 

Note: You will be able to select which of the forgoing conditions you wish to screen for after clicking the "Continue" button below.

Contact Form

Use the following form in lieu of contacting Radiant Interactive Group via email or phone

Phone
   Ext: